Category Archives: Records Management

Webinar Recording Now Available: Solving Shared Drives

The live recording of the webinar I delivered with Mark Rye of Perram Corporation on “Solving Shared Drives.” is now available below, or here on YouTube. Enjoy. We will be publishing the whitepaper shortly as well.

Also posted in Events, Information Governance | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Slides from my webinar on Solving Shared Drives

Here are the slides from the webinar we just completed on “Solving Shared Drives.” I personally don’t find slides divorced from their presentation that useful, but this will give you a flavor of what we talked about. Also, we will be shortly following up with a whitepaper on the topic as well as the recording [...]

Also posted in Events, Information Governance | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Solving the Shared Drive Problem

The sexy Information Governance problems today are (in rough order of sex appeal): Social Media Big Data Cloud Computing Somewhere waaaay down at the bottom of this list comes, “Governing shared network drives.” However, in real life – outside of the hype cycle – solving the shared drive problem is right near the top of [...]

Also posted in Events, Information Governance, Social Media | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Formal Legal Hold policies and process are not optional – even for “informal” information

“Here, a fine against [the company] serves the dual purposes of deterrence and punishment . . . Because [those responsible for spoliation] are the sole principals of [the company], a fine directed at [the company] will affect them directly.” Passlogix, Inc. v. 2FA Tech[i] What Happened? A partnership between two businesses failed, and litigation ensued. [...]

Also posted in E-Discovery, Information Governance | Tagged | Leave a comment

How well do you understand your email system? Litigation is not the time to find out.

“Had [outside counsel] fulfilled his obligation to familiarize himself with GFI’s policies earlier, the forensic searches and subsequent motions would have been unnecessary.” In re A & M Fla. Props.[i] 1.1     What happened? Two companies agreed to a $41 million real estate transaction. However, before the transaction closed, the sellers refinanced the properties in such [...]

Also posted in E-Discovery, Information Governance | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments