<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Barclay T. Blair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barclaytblair.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barclaytblair.com</link>
	<description>Essays in Information Governance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advancing a Definition of Information Governance by Updating Our Information Governance Survey</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/advancing-a-definition-of-information-governance/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Updating Our Information Governance Survey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=1115#comment-823</guid>
		<description>[...] off of the Information Governance survey we did last year, eDJ Group and my firm, ViaLumina, are conducting another survey on Information Governance, and we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] off of the Information Governance survey we did last year, eDJ Group and my firm, ViaLumina, are conducting another survey on Information Governance, and we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making the Case for IG &#8211;  eBook by Making the Case for Information Governance: eBook on SlideShare</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/making-the-case-for-ig-ebook/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Making the Case for Information Governance: eBook on SlideShare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=891#comment-659</guid>
		<description>[...] Information Governance Makes Sense View more documents from Barclay Blair. Note that you can also download a PDF of the eBook here.  Share this:  This entry was posted in Information Governance and tagged eBook, Information [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Information Governance Makes Sense View more documents from Barclay Blair. Note that you can also download a PDF of the eBook here.  Share this:  This entry was posted in Information Governance and tagged eBook, Information [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making the Case for Information Governance: eBook on SlideShare by Barclay</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/making-the-case-for-information-governance-ebook-on-slideshare/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Barclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=1121#comment-658</guid>
		<description>Aaron, yes you can download the PDF here: http://barclaytblair.com/making-the-case-for-ig-ebook/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, yes you can download the PDF here: <a href="http://barclaytblair.com/making-the-case-for-ig-ebook/" rel="nofollow">http://barclaytblair.com/making-the-case-for-ig-ebook/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making the Case for Information Governance: eBook on SlideShare by Aaron Bryant</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/making-the-case-for-information-governance-ebook-on-slideshare/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=1121#comment-657</guid>
		<description>How can a pdf copy of this e-book? Any help would be apreciated, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a pdf copy of this e-book? Any help would be apreciated, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solving the Shared Drive Problem by Webinar Recording Now Available: Solving Shared Drives</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/solving-shared-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Webinar Recording Now Available: Solving Shared Drives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=1063#comment-623</guid>
		<description>[...] live recording of the webinar we delivered with Perram Corporation on “Solving Shared Drives.” is now available below, or here on YouTube. Enjoy. We will be publishing the whitepaper shortly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] live recording of the webinar we delivered with Perram Corporation on “Solving Shared Drives.” is now available below, or here on YouTube. Enjoy. We will be publishing the whitepaper shortly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How well do you understand your email system? Litigation is not the time to find out. by Barclay</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/how-well-do-you-understand-your-email-system-litigation-is-not-the-time-to-find-out/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Barclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=1027#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Yes, good question. I believe the issue is that there was a disagreement about what was disclosed prior to the contract being signed, and which was thus the basis for the contract, i.e., &quot;The Defendant was especially interested in obtaining email communications evidencing the fact that GFI had received copies of the promissory notes which contained the lock-out features. Although the Defendant was certain Plaintiffs should be in possession of such emails, they were not produced. . . . When GFI did not produce this email or many others that American Federated sent to GFI regarding the transaction, American Federated became suspicious of GFI&#039;s willingness to fulfill its discovery obligations in good faith.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good question. I believe the issue is that there was a disagreement about what was disclosed prior to the contract being signed, and which was thus the basis for the contract, i.e., &#8220;The Defendant was especially interested in obtaining email communications evidencing the fact that GFI had received copies of the promissory notes which contained the lock-out features. Although the Defendant was certain Plaintiffs should be in possession of such emails, they were not produced. . . . When GFI did not produce this email or many others that American Federated sent to GFI regarding the transaction, American Federated became suspicious of GFI&#8217;s willingness to fulfill its discovery obligations in good faith.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How well do you understand your email system? Litigation is not the time to find out. by Juerg Meier</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/how-well-do-you-understand-your-email-system-litigation-is-not-the-time-to-find-out/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Juerg Meier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=1027#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Barclay,
While 22 months are obviously an unacceptable period to produce the responsive emails, let me ask this perhaps naive question (and sorry for my more than limited knowledge of US laws and procedures): why were they referring to emails at all? 

I mean, how a real estate is financed, loans, mortgages et al., are such fundamental parameters of any transaction that they usually make a good part of the contract. So, in my (as mentioned outside US) view, if it&#039;s not written in the contract between seller and buyer, or the seller has not formally informed the buyer (e.g. by letter asking for a modification of the contract)  about the change in financing, I would clearly say that the seller is to be found guilty. 

Prioritizing the contract may have avoided *any* effort regarding collecting emails.
Juerg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barclay,<br />
While 22 months are obviously an unacceptable period to produce the responsive emails, let me ask this perhaps naive question (and sorry for my more than limited knowledge of US laws and procedures): why were they referring to emails at all? </p>
<p>I mean, how a real estate is financed, loans, mortgages et al., are such fundamental parameters of any transaction that they usually make a good part of the contract. So, in my (as mentioned outside US) view, if it&#8217;s not written in the contract between seller and buyer, or the seller has not formally informed the buyer (e.g. by letter asking for a modification of the contract)  about the change in financing, I would clearly say that the seller is to be found guilty. </p>
<p>Prioritizing the contract may have avoided *any* effort regarding collecting emails.<br />
Juerg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A New Blog Series on Email Management and Information Governance by Barclay</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/email-management-information-governanc/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Barclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=961#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Great to hear, Scott. Email continues to be the number one real-world issue that out clients face today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear, Scott. Email continues to be the number one real-world issue that out clients face today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A New Blog Series on Email Management and Information Governance by Scott Burt</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/email-management-information-governanc/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=961#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Hi Barclay, I&#039;m excited to follow along on your series on Email Management!  You&#039;re articulating so well what so many of my clients are thinking today, but they&#039;ll benefit from your research and opinions here.

Scott Burt
Integro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barclay, I&#8217;m excited to follow along on your series on Email Management!  You&#8217;re articulating so well what so many of my clients are thinking today, but they&#8217;ll benefit from your research and opinions here.</p>
<p>Scott Burt<br />
Integro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s define &#8220;Information Governance&#8221; by Naina Visani</title>
		<link>http://barclaytblair.com/lets-define-information-governance/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Naina Visani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barclaytblair.com/?p=531#comment-471</guid>
		<description>probably a lot later than the original post, but here is my favourite definition of IG:
Information governance is a holistic approach to managing corporate information by implementing processes, roles, controls and metrics that treat information as a valuable business asset.
BTW - like your blogs on this topic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>probably a lot later than the original post, but here is my favourite definition of IG:<br />
Information governance is a holistic approach to managing corporate information by implementing processes, roles, controls and metrics that treat information as a valuable business asset.<br />
BTW &#8211; like your blogs on this topic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

